[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200428101900.GG3456981@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:19:00 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] DRM: ARC: add HDMI 2.0 TX encoder support
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 05:55:38PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> On 15/04/2020 19:33, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 02:29:28AM +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> >> The Synopsys ARC SoCs (like HSDK4xD) include on-chip DesignWare HDMI
> >> encoders. Support them with a platform driver to provide platform glue
> >> data to the dw-hdmi driver.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>
> >> ---
> >> MAINTAINERS | 6 ++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile | 2 +-
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/arc/Kconfig | 7 ++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/arc/Makefile | 1 +
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/arc/arc-dw-hdmi.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 5 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/arc/arc-dw-hdmi.c
> >>
> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> >> index a6fbdf354d34..2aaed1190370 100644
> >> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >> @@ -1258,6 +1258,12 @@ S: Supported
> >> F: drivers/gpu/drm/arc/
> >> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/snps,arcpgu.txt
> >>
> >> +ARC DW HDMI DRIVER
> >> +M: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>
> >> +S: Supported
> >> +F: drivers/gpu/drm/arc/arc-dw-hdmi.c
> >> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/snps,arc-dw-hdmi.yaml
> >> +
> >> ARCNET NETWORK LAYER
> >> M: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@...gutronix.de>
> >> L: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile
> >> index 6493088a0fdd..5b0bcf7f45cd 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile
> >> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ obj-y += panel/
> >> obj-y += bridge/
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_FSL_DCU) += fsl-dcu/
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_ETNAVIV) += etnaviv/
> >> -obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_ARCPGU)+= arc/
> >> +obj-y += arc/
> >> obj-y += hisilicon/
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_ZTE) += zte/
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_MXSFB) += mxsfb/
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arc/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/arc/Kconfig
> >> index e8f3d63e0b91..baec9d2a4fba 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arc/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arc/Kconfig
> >> @@ -8,3 +8,10 @@ config DRM_ARCPGU
> >> Choose this option if you have an ARC PGU controller.
> >>
> >> If M is selected the module will be called arcpgu.
> >> +
> >> +config DRM_ARC_DW_HDMI
> >> + tristate "ARC DW HDMI"
> >> + depends on DRM && OF
> >> + select DRM_DW_HDMI
> >> + help
> >> + Synopsys DW HDMI driver for various ARC development boards
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arc/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/arc/Makefile
> >> index c7028b7427b3..7a156d8c2c3c 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arc/Makefile
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arc/Makefile
> >> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> >> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >> arcpgu-y := arcpgu_crtc.o arcpgu_hdmi.o arcpgu_sim.o arcpgu_drv.o
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_ARCPGU) += arcpgu.o
> >> +obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_ARC_DW_HDMI) += arc-dw-hdmi.o
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arc/arc-dw-hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arc/arc-dw-hdmi.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..46a6ee09b302
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arc/arc-dw-hdmi.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> >> +//
> >> +// Synopsys DW HDMI driver for various ARC development boards
> >> +//
> >> +// Copyright (C) 2020 Synopsys
> >> +// Author: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/component.h>
> >> +#include <linux/module.h>
> >> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >> +#include <drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.h>
> >> +#include <drm/drm_crtc_helper.h>
> >> +#include <drm/drm_edid.h>
> >> +#include <drm/drm_encoder_slave.h>
> >> +#include <drm/drm_of.h>
> >> +
> >> +static const struct dw_hdmi_mpll_config snps_hdmi_mpll_cfg[] = {
> >> + {
> >> + 27000000, {
> >> + { 0x00B3, 0x0000 },
> >> + { 0x00B3, 0x0000 },
> >> + { 0x00B3, 0x0000 }
> >> + },
> >> + }, {
> >> + 74250000, {
> >> + { 0x0072, 0x0001},
> >> + { 0x0072, 0x0001},
> >> + { 0x0072, 0x0001}
> >> + },
> >> + }, {
> >> + 148500000, {
> >> + { 0x0051, 0x0002},
> >> + { 0x0051, 0x0002},
> >> + { 0x0051, 0x0002}
> >> + },
> >> + }, {
> >> + ~0UL, {
> >> + { 0x00B3, 0x0000 },
> >> + { 0x00B3, 0x0000 },
> >> + { 0x00B3, 0x0000 },
> >> + },
> >> + }
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct dw_hdmi_curr_ctrl snps_hdmi_cur_ctr[] = {
> >> + /* pixelclk bpp8 bpp10 bpp12 */
> >> + { 27000000, { 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000 }, },
> >> + { 74250000, { 0x0008, 0x0008, 0x0008 }, },
> >> + { 148500000, { 0x001b, 0x001b, 0x001b }, },
> >> + { ~0UL, { 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000 }, }
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +
> >> +static const struct dw_hdmi_phy_config snps_hdmi_phy_config[] = {
> >> + /* pixelclk symbol term vlev */
> >> + { 27000000, 0x8009, 0x0004, 0x0232},
> >> + { 74250000, 0x8009, 0x0004, 0x0232},
> >> + { 148500000, 0x8009, 0x0004, 0x0232},
> >> + { ~0UL, 0x8009, 0x0004, 0x0232}
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static struct dw_hdmi_plat_data snps_dw_hdmi_drv_data = {
> >> + .mpll_cfg = snps_hdmi_mpll_cfg,
> >> + .cur_ctr = snps_hdmi_cur_ctr,
> >> + .phy_config = snps_hdmi_phy_config,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct of_device_id snps_dw_hdmi_dt_ids[] = {
> >> + { .compatible = "snps,arc-dw-hdmi-hsdk", .data = &snps_dw_hdmi_drv_data },
> >> + { /* sentinel */ }
> >> +};
> >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, snps_dw_hdmi_dt_ids);
> >> +
> >> +static int snps_dw_hdmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> +{
> >> + const struct dw_hdmi_plat_data *plat_data;
> >> + const struct of_device_id *match;
> >> + struct dw_hdmi *hdmi;
> >> +
> >> + if (!pdev->dev.of_node)
> >> + return -ENODEV;
> >> +
> >> + match = of_match_node(snps_dw_hdmi_dt_ids, pdev->dev.of_node);
> >> + plat_data = match->data;
> >> +
> >> + hdmi = dw_hdmi_probe(pdev, plat_data);
> >
> > So this is kinda not how bridge drivers are supposed to be done nowadays,
> > direct calling into the driver was the old way, and dw-hdmi still works
> > like that. Modern way is roughly
> > - bridge drivers bind automatically to any bridge they support
> > - bridge drivers publish a bridge with drm_bridge_add()
> > - the driver using the bridge fishes out with dt magic using
> > of_drm_find_bridge() or another of the related of_ functions
>
> dw-hdmi is an IP, with some platform specific code and arrays to make it work
> on very different systems, thus we can't use this scheme everywhere....
>
> Some platforms (like r-car) uses the "right" model because the IP is integrated
> as-is with the default PHY and as an independent IP on the system.
>
> It's definitely not the case on Rockchip/Amlogic/Allwinner systems,
> and even worse on Amlogic system having a glue on top of the IP, and a
> custom PHY instead of the Synopsys PHY.
>
> Thus it would be great this would be the case on a Synopsys SoC... but like
> other platforms they have platform specific parameters.
>
> All this has been discussed and reviewed a few years ago, I would
> personally prefer "fishing out a bridge using dt magic" instead having
> 1k glue code around the IP.
I'm not opposed to the per-instance glue code, that seems required. I'm
kinda questioning where it is.
Current design is that the glue code is in the drm_device driver side of
things, with the drm_bridge somewhat awkward in-between. That doesn't seem
very clean.
I think more suitable for drm_bridge would be to push all the glue behind
the drm_bridge (maybe into separate files in a drm/bridge/dw-hdmi/
directory), and the drm_device driver side simply grabs a drm_bridge and
that's it. Then the drm_bridge abstraction lines up with the code
organization again. Atm it's a bit a confusing state of things.
Plan B would be to give up dw-hdmi being a drm_bridge, and rework dw-hdmi
to be some kind of helper library to build a driver for a specific dw-hdmi
instance. I think that would also be a clean design.
But right now we kinda have a bit of both, so not really abstracted, but
also not really a clean helper without midlayer either, and that doesn't
look great.
-Daniel
>
> Neil
>
> >
> > I know a bit late, just spotted this because you brought your series here
> > up in my arc cleanup series, but can you pls look into adjusting
> > accordingly?
> >
> > I shouldn't take more than moving this binding here into the dw-hdmi
> > driver, and switching arc itself over to the of_drm_find_bridge() call.
> > That way we could slowly work to transform old bridge drivers like dw-hdmi
> > to the new way, instead of adding more cases that will never get
> > converted.
> >
> > Other upside is that arc stays a neat&tiny driver :-)
> >
> > Thanks, Daniel
> >
> >> + if (IS_ERR(hdmi))
> >> + return PTR_ERR(hdmi);
> >> +
> >> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, hdmi);
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int snps_dw_hdmi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> +{
> >> + struct dw_hdmi *hdmi = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >> +
> >> + dw_hdmi_remove(hdmi);
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static struct platform_driver snps_dw_hdmi_platform_driver = {
> >> + .probe = snps_dw_hdmi_probe,
> >> + .remove = snps_dw_hdmi_remove,
> >> + .driver = {
> >> + .name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
> >> + .of_match_table = snps_dw_hdmi_dt_ids,
> >> + },
> >> +};
> >> +module_platform_driver(snps_dw_hdmi_platform_driver);
> >> +
> >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> >> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ARC specific DW-HDMI driver extension");
> >> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>");
> >> --
> >> 2.21.1
> >>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists