[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200428125426.GE2014@kadam>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:54:26 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: okaya@...nel.org, agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: Simplify error handling path in
hidma_probe
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:10:43PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> There is no need to call 'hidma_debug_uninit()' in the error handling
> path. 'hidma_debug_init()' has not been called yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c
> index 411f91fde734..87490e125bc3 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c
> @@ -897,7 +897,6 @@ static int hidma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (msi)
^^^
This test doesn't work. It will call free hidma_free_msis() if the
hidma_request_msi() call fails. We should do:
if (msi) {
rc = hidma_request_msi(dmadev, pdev);
msi = false;
}
if (!msi) {
hidma_ll_setup_irq(dmadev->lldev, false);
rc = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, chirq, hidma_chirq_handler,
0, "qcom-hidma", dmadev->lldev);
if (rc)
goto uninit;
}
> hidma_free_msis(dmadev);
>
> - hidma_debug_uninit(dmadev);
> hidma_ll_uninit(dmadev->lldev);
> dmafree:
> if (dmadev)
^^^^^^
This test isn't necessary and should be deleted.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists