linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/gup.c: Updating the documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200428074744.72e9e976@lwn.net>
Date:   Tue, 28 Apr 2020 07:47:44 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/gup.c: Updating the documentation

On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:26:06 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 00:23:50 +0530 Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > This patch is an attempt to update the documentation.
> > 
> > * Adding / removing extra * based on type of function
> > static / global.  
> 
> I don't think so, unless this is a new kerneldoc convention?

Nope, no new convention here.  If it's a kerneldoc comment, it should be
marked as such.  The kerneldoc utility can sort them out later.

jon