lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:27:30 -0600
From:   Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@...eaurora.org>, mani@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        hemantk@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] bus: mhi: core: Handle firmware load using state
 worker

Err, you fixed the SOB on patches 1-3, but now broke 4+.

On 4/27/2020 8:59 PM, Bhaumik Bhatt wrote:

No "From: ..." means you are the author.

> Upon power up, driver queues firmware worker thread if the execution
> environment is PBL. Firmware worker is blocked with a timeout until
> state worker gets a chance to run and unblock firmware worker. An
> endpoint power up failure can be seen if state worker gets a chance to
> run after firmware worker has timed out. Remove this dependency and
> handle firmware load directly using state worker thread.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@...eaurora.org>

SOB from you meets the developers certificate of origin.

> Signed-off-by: Hemant Kumar <hemantk@...eaurora.org>

SOB from Hemant here, is confusing.  This would normally signal that 
Hemant is sending a patch you authored (ie patches 1-3 are authored by 
Hemant but you posted them to list), and he is attesting that he has the 
right to do so (certificate of origin), but this email came from you. 
This doesn't add up.

If you are trying to imply that Hemant wrote this change with you, there 
is a Co-authored-by tag you can use (goes before the SOB) to indicate 
multiple authors since git only has a single author field.  The 
Documentation/process/submitting-patches I pointed out on v1 should have 
the details for this.

Otherwise, you are listed as the author, and the patch has your SOB, 
therefore nothing else is needed.

-- 
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ