linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: davinci-mcasp: Fix dma_chan refcnt leak when getting dma type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <158808845301.38316.4295335202430928614.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:40:59 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
        Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@...an.edu.cn>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Cc:     kjlu@....edu, yuanxzhang@...an.edu.cn,
        Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: davinci-mcasp: Fix dma_chan refcnt leak when getting dma type

On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 20:48:35 +0800, Xiyu Yang wrote:
> davinci_mcasp_get_dma_type() invokes dma_request_chan(), which returns a
> reference of the specified dma_chan object to "chan" with increased
> refcnt.
> 
> When davinci_mcasp_get_dma_type() returns, local variable "chan" becomes
> invalid, so the refcount should be decreased to keep refcount balanced.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-5.7

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: davinci-mcasp: Fix dma_chan refcnt leak when getting dma type
      commit: a697ae6ea56e23397341b027098c1b11d9ab13da

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark