[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200428155845.GA1611284@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:58:45 +0200
From: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Stahl, Manuel" <manuel.stahl@...-extern.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: "hjk@...utronix.de" <hjk@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"sojkam1@....cvut.cz" <sojkam1@....cvut.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Add new uio device for PCI with dynamic memory
allocation
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:47:42PM +0000, Stahl, Manuel wrote:
> >
> > > + return err;
> > > + }
> > > + pci_set_master(pdev);
> > > +
> > > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Legacy IRQ: %i", pdev->irq);
> >
> > Again, remove, be quiet :)
>
> Use dev_dbg() or remove completely?
If it helps in debugging, dev_dbg() is fine to use.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists