[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200429181614.GL30459@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 20:16:14 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, mkl@...gutronix.de,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Christian Herber <christian.herber@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] ethtool: provide UAPI for PHY
master/slave configuration.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 09:53:07AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
Hi Oleksij
Sorry for taking a while to review this. I was busy fixing the FEC
driver which i broke :-(
> --- a/Documentation/networking/ethtool-netlink.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/ethtool-netlink.rst
> @@ -399,6 +399,8 @@ Kernel response contents:
> ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_PEER`` bitset partner link modes
> ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_SPEED`` u32 link speed (Mb/s)
> ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_DUPLEX`` u8 duplex mode
> + ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_MASTER_SLAVE_CFG`` u8 Master/slave port mode
> + ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_MASTER_SLAVE_STATE`` u8 Master/slave port mode
> ==================================== ====== ==========================
I've not used Sphinx for a while. But it used to be, tables had to be
correctly aligned. I think you need to pad the other rows with spaces.
Also, the comments should differ. The first is how we want it
configured, the second is the current state.
>
> For ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_OURS``, value represents advertised modes and mask
> @@ -421,6 +423,7 @@ Request contents:
> ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_PEER`` bitset partner link modes
> ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_SPEED`` u32 link speed (Mb/s)
> ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_DUPLEX`` u8 duplex mode
> + ``ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_MASTER_SLAVE_CFG`` u8 Master/slave port mode
> ==================================== ====== ==========================
Same table cleanup needed here.
> +static int genphy_read_master_slave(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> + int cfg, state = 0;
> + u16 val;
> +
> + phydev->master_slave_get = 0;
> + phydev->master_slave_state = 0;
Could you use the _UNKNOWN #defined here?
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
> index 92f737f101178..eb680e3d6bda5 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
> @@ -1666,6 +1666,31 @@ static inline int ethtool_validate_duplex(__u8 duplex)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline int ethtool_validate_master_slave_cfg(__u8 cfg)
> +{
> + switch (cfg) {
> + case PORT_MODE_CFG_MASTER_PREFERRED:
> + case PORT_MODE_CFG_SLAVE_PREFERRED:
> + case PORT_MODE_CFG_MASTER_FORCE:
> + case PORT_MODE_CFG_SLAVE_FORCE:
> + case PORT_MODE_CFG_UNKNOWN:
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Does this need to be an inline function?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists