[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200429182505.GB21158@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 20:25:05 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, john.garry@...wei.com,
Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@...at.org>,
Daniel Silsby <dansilsby@...il.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Mark Tomlinson <mark.tomlinson@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] MIPS: Massage address spaces headers
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 07:45:19PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>
>
> 于 2020年4月28日 GMT+08:00 下午7:33:26, Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de> 写到:
> >On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 10:14:12AM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> >> That would allow us modify kernel vm address spaces without
> >> step into the hell of includes.
> >>
> >> Also use some marcos for address spaces to make spaces.h more
> >> clear.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
> >
> >I don't like this patch as I can't see a good reason for shuffling
> >stuff arround. Can you drop this from this series ?
>
> The problem is without this patch we'll have to include pgtable-32.h and
> pgtable-64.h into asm/io.h, and that will become totally hell.
sure, but this would just mean moving VMALLOC_START, but not the other
stuff in this patch, which is more what I dislike...
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists