[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200429053456.GE8452@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:34:56 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: amirmizi6@...il.com
Cc: Eyal.Cohen@...oton.com, oshrialkoby85@...il.com,
alexander.steffen@...ineon.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca,
arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, benoit.houyere@...com,
eajames@...ux.ibm.com, joel@....id.au, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
oshri.alkoby@...oton.com, tmaimon77@...il.com, gcwilson@...ibm.com,
kgoldman@...ibm.com, Dan.Morav@...oton.com,
oren.tanami@...oton.com, shmulik.hager@...oton.com,
amir.mizinski@...oton.com,
Christophe Ricard <christophe-h.ricard@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/7] tpm: tpm_tis: Add verify_data_integrity handle
toy tpm_tis_phy_ops
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 03:49:26PM +0300, amirmizi6@...il.com wrote:
> + bool (*verify_data_integrity)(struct tpm_tis_data *data, const u8 *buf,
> + size_t len);
Why can't the i2c driver verify this in the end of read_bytes()?
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists