[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200429081606.GP29015@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 09:16:09 +0100
From: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@....com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
libc-alpha <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
carlos <carlos@...hat.com>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ben Maurer <bmaurer@...com>, Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH glibc 5/9] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at C
startup and thread creation (v17)
The 04/28/2020 10:58, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> ----- On Apr 28, 2020, at 8:54 AM, Florian Weimer fw@...eb.enyo.de wrote:
> > That one definitely should work.
> >
> > I expect you might see this if libgcc_s.so.1 is installed into a
> > multiarch subdirectory that upstream glibc does not search. (The
> > Debian patches are unfortunately not upstream.)
>
> My test environment is a Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS.
>
> >
> > I think on my system, the built glibc can find the system libgcc_s via
> > /etc/ld.so.cache, so I haven't seen this issue yet.
>
> On my system, libgcc_s is provided here:
>
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
>
> by this package:
>
> Package: libgcc1
> Architecture: amd64
> Version: 1:8.4.0-1ubuntu1~18.04
before running the tests
cp `$CC --print-file-name libgcc_s.so.1` glibc/build/dir
cp `$CC --print-file-name libstdc++.so.6` glibc/build/dir
so those toolchain libs are in the search path
of the newly built libc when running tests.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists