[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=Us6LyfgeXvxnqq+KhHN1djok1y+W_xzSb-KGFy2wgEMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:50:26 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: LinusW <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: Make "offset" and "unsigned int", not just "unsigned"
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 5:38 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 17:23 -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > When I copied the function prototypes from the GPIO header file into
> > my own driver, checkpatch yelled at me saying that I shouldn't use use
> > "unsigned" but instead should say "unsigned int". Let's make the
> > header file use "unsigned int" so others who copy like I did won't get
> > yelled at.
>
> There are a few other unsigned declarations in the file.
There are? I swear I looked for them before I sent my patch and I
couldn't find them. Then I looked again upon seeing your reply and I
still can't find them. My eyes are bad, though. Maybe you can give
me specifics?
> Maybe do all of them (and remove the unnecessary externs)?
You mean just remove the word "extern" everywhere in this file? Sure,
I can if you want.
> trivial reformatting of the function pointer block too
Wow, I must be totally out of it. Maybe it's the gin and tonic I just
had. I don't understand this comment either. Can you clarify?
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists