linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: serial: Add MaxLinear/Exar USB to Serial driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200429092904.GA2079263@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:29:04 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Cc:     johan@...nel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patong.mxl@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: serial: Add MaxLinear/Exar USB to Serial driver

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 01:10:26PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 09:20:36AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 01:26:50AM +0530, mani@...nel.org wrote:
> > > From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
> > > 
> > > Add support for MaxLinear/Exar USB to Serial converters. This driver
> > > only supports XR21V141X series but provision has been made to support
> > > other series in future.
> > > 
> > > This driver is inspired from the initial one submitted by Patong Yang:
> > > 
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10543261/
> > > 
> > > While the initial driver was a custom tty USB driver exposing whole
> > > new serial interface ttyXRUSBn, this version is completely based on USB
> > > serial core thus exposing the interfaces as ttyUSBn. This will avoid
> > > the overhead of exposing a new USB serial interface which the userspace
> > > tools are unaware of.
> > 
> > Nice work!
> > 
> > Some comments below:
> > 
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > > +/*
> > > + * MaxLinear/Exar USB to Serial driver
> > > + *
> > > + * Based on initial driver written by Patong Yang <patong.mxl@...il.com>
> > > + *
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2020 Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > > +#include <linux/tty.h>
> > > +#include <linux/usb.h>
> > > +#include <linux/usb/serial.h>
> > > +
> > > +#include "xr_serial.h"
> > 
> > No need for a .h file for a single .c file.
> > 
> 
> Yeah but since this driver can support multiple series of XR chips (they
> might have separate register definitions and such), I thought it is a good
> idea to have a header file to keep the driver sane. But can club it to the
> source file for now.

Don't worry about future stuff, focus on what you need to do now :)

> > > +static int xr_get_reg(struct usb_serial_port *port, u8 block, u16 reg,
> > > +		      u16 *val)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct usb_serial *serial = port->serial;
> > > +	struct xr_port_private *port_priv = usb_get_serial_port_data(port);
> > > +	void *dmabuf;
> > > +	int ret = -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	dmabuf = kmalloc(sizeof(reg), GFP_KERNEL);
> > 
> > So that is 2 bytes?
> > 
> 
> Explanation below...
> 
> > > +	if (!dmabuf)
> > > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > +	if (port_priv->idProduct == XR21V141X_ID) {
> > > +		/* XR21V141X uses custom command for reading UART registers */
> > > +		ret = usb_control_msg(serial->dev,
> > > +				      usb_rcvctrlpipe(serial->dev, 0),
> > > +				      XR_GET_XR21V141X,
> > > +				      USB_DIR_IN | USB_TYPE_VENDOR, 0,
> > > +				      reg | (block << 8), dmabuf,
> > > +				      port_priv->reg_width,
> > > +				      USB_CTRL_SET_TIMEOUT);
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	if (ret == port_priv->reg_width) {
> > > +		memcpy(val, dmabuf, port_priv->reg_width);
> > 
> > But here you copy ->reg_width bytes in?  How do you know val can hold
> > that much?  It's only set to be 1, so you copy 1 byte to a 16bit value?
> > What part of the 16bits did you just copy those 8 bits to (hint, think
> > cpu endian issues...)
> > 
> > That feels really really odd and a bit broken.
> > 
> 
> Right. The reason is, the other series which can be supported by this driver
> have different register widths. For instance XR2280x. I haven't used them
> personally but seen this in initial driver. So I just used the max u16 type
> to make the reg_{set/get} routines work with those.

Drop the whole "different register width" stuff for now, as the driver
does not support it and it adds additional complexity that is hard to
review for no good reason.  If you want to add support for new devices
later, _then_ we can add support for that.

Don't over-engineer :)

> But agree, I should've used le16_to_cpu() cast to avoid endian issues.

You have to, the code is broken as-is right now.

> If you think this hack is not required now, I can just use u8 and worry about
> compatibility later.

Please do so.

thanks,

greg k-h