lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 09:43:24 +0000 From: "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@...du.com> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>, "jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>, "wanpengli@...cent.com" <wanpengli@...cent.com>, "vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>, "sean.j.christopherson@...el.com" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>, "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com> Subject: 答复: [PATCH][v2] kvm: x86: emulate APERF/MPERF registers > > Would it make sense to provide a pass-through APERF/MPERF for > KVM_HINTS_REALTIME ? Because that hint guarantees we have a 1:1 > vCPU:CPU binding and guaranteed no over-commit. Make sense I think this can be done in a separate patch for KVM_HINTS_REALTIME Thanks =Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists