[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00904210a2674cc88848061f2a173b65@baidu.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 09:43:24 +0000
From: "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@...du.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>,
"wanpengli@...cent.com" <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"sean.j.christopherson@...el.com" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: 答复: [PATCH][v2] kvm: x86: emulate APERF/MPERF registers
>
> Would it make sense to provide a pass-through APERF/MPERF for
> KVM_HINTS_REALTIME ? Because that hint guarantees we have a 1:1
> vCPU:CPU binding and guaranteed no over-commit.
Make sense
I think this can be done in a separate patch for KVM_HINTS_REALTIME
Thanks
=Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists