lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:07:34 +0530 From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org, Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/168] 5.4.36-rc1 review On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 00:01, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.36 release. > There are 168 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 30 Apr 2020 18:21:07 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.36-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------ kernel: 5.4.36-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.4.y git commit: 388ff47a1fba8fa27be759acc4f846a75df6bde0 git describe: v5.4.35-169-g388ff47a1fba8 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-5.4-oe/build/v5.4.35-169-g388ff47a1fba8 No regressions (compared to build v5.4.35) No fixes (compared to build v5.4.35) Ran 32617 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environmnts -------------- - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - nxp-ls2088 - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan Test Suites ----------- * build * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest * kselftest/drivers * kselftest/filesystems * libgpiod * linux-log-parser * perf * network-basic-tests * kselftest/net * kselftest/networking * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * spectre-meltdown-checker-test * v4l2-compliance * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native/drivers * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native/filesystems * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native/net * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native/networking * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none/drivers * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none/filesystems * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none/net * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none/networking -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists