lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <08eafcec5b92626e1ad7906b948419e7300e7684.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:20:47 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@...il.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier

On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 13:46 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> There is simply no point in EVER changing "GPL-2.0" into
> "GPL-2.0-only" etc, unless the thing is then touched for some other
> reason (which it may never be).

Which is _exactly_ what is happening here.

But the reason _not_ to touch it here is there would
be a difference between the SPDX license text in the
.c and .h files in the directory.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ