linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86/mm: Sync all vmalloc mappings before text

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200429082854.6e1796b5@oasis.local.home>
Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:28:54 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tz.stoyanov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86/mm: Sync all vmalloc mappings before
 text_poke()

On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:59:41 +0200
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de> wrote:

> >   use_temporary_mm() {
> >     switch_mm_irqs_off() {
> >       load_new_mm_cr3() {
> >         write_cr3() <<--- Lock up!  
> 
> I don't see how it could lock up in write_cr3(), at least on bare-metal.
> What is the environment this happens, 32 or 64 bit, in a VM or
> bare-metal?

64 bit bare-metal. In fact, it wasn't reproducible on a VM (according
to Tzvetomir, who was just using a Fedora kernel). I only tried it on
bare-metal.

> 
> I think it is more likely that your lockup is actually a page-fault
> loop, where the #PF handler does not map the faulting address correctly.

Sounds reasonable.

> 
> But I have to look closer into how text_poke() works before I can say
> more.
> 
> Btw, in case it happens on x86-64, does it also happen without
> vmalloc-stacks?

Just tried it out with !CONFIG_VMAP_STACKS and it still locks up :-/

-- Steve