linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] scsi: ufs: add LU Dedicated buffer type support for WriteBooster

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 21:05:06 +0800
From:   Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
To:     "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@...ron.com>
CC:     "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
        "alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        "cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
        "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kuohong.wang@...iatek.com" <kuohong.wang@...iatek.com>,
        "peter.wang@...iatek.com" <peter.wang@...iatek.com>,
        "chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com" <chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com>,
        "andy.teng@...iatek.com" <andy.teng@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] scsi: ufs: add LU Dedicated buffer type support
 for WriteBooster

Hi Bean,

On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 10:39 +0000, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
> > 
> > +/* WriteBooster buffer type */
> > +enum {
> > +	WB_TYPE_LU_DEDICATED	= 0x0,
> > +	WB_TYPE_SINGLE_SHARED	= 0x1
> > +};
> 
> 
> Hi,  Stanly
> WB_TYPE_SINGLE_SHARED might be WB_TYPE_SHARED_BUFFER.  I think,
> we should try to make the name definition correspond to Spec

Make sense. I will fix this in next version.

Thanks,
Stanley Chu