linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mtd: rawnand: Add NAND controller support on Intel LGM SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200429153205.09c498cd@collabora.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 15:32:05 +0200
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
To:     "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" 
        <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
        richard@....at, vigneshr@...com, arnd@...db.de,
        brendanhiggins@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        anders.roxell@...aro.org, masonccyang@...c.com.tw,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        hauke.mehrtens@...el.com, andriy.shevchenko@...el.com,
        qi-ming.wu@...el.com, cheol.yong.kim@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mtd: rawnand: Add NAND controller support on
 Intel LGM SoC

On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 21:29:40 +0800
"Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX"
<vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> Hi Boris,
> 
>     Thank you very much for the review comments and your time..
> 
> On 29/4/2020 7:33 pm, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:42:05 +0800
> > "Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX"
> > <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> +#define NAND_WRITE_CMD		(EBU_CON_CS_P_LOW | HSNAND_CLE_OFFS)
> >> +#define NAND_WRITE_ADDR		(EBU_CON_CS_P_LOW | HSNAND_ALE_OFFS)
> >> +  
> > 
> > I thought we agreed on dropping those definitions.  
> 
> Yes , we agreed upon it, due to assertion/de-assertion of CS kept it.

And I keep thinking we don't need that, just pass
'HSNAND_CLE_OFFS | HSNAND_CS_OFFS' directly.