[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4444ceef-14c7-0975-673f-6fdeefdc4dc0@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:55:55 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Kirill Smelkov <kirr@...edi.com>,
Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Philipp Rudo <prudo@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
On 17.04.20 17:01, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Looking into why we still create memblocks for hotplugged memory (via
> add_memory()), I discovered that we might not need ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK on
> s390x after all.
>
> After [1] we will no longer create memblocks for hotplugged memory in
> case of !CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK. With this series, the same will apply
> to standby memory on s390x, added via add_memory().
>
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200416104707.20219-1-david@redhat.com
>
> David Hildenbrand (2):
> s390/zcore: traverse resources instead of memblocks
> s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
>
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 -
> drivers/s390/char/zcore.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
Ping.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists