linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Lock warning cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200430144114.GE4633@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:41:14 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Lock warning cleanup

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 03:23:17PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> [1/2] cxgb4: Add missing annotation for service_ofldq()
>       commit: d7f27df50eea54fd00c26c5dda7bc12d2541e5e4

Sorry, I didn't register that this was part of a series when I
downloaded the mailbox - I'll drop that commit.  When sending small
cleanups like this to unrelated subsystems putting them in a series, it
makes it look like there's dependencies.  This is especially true if
you're not CCing the whole series to everyone, that's often a sign that
you can just separate the cleanups.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)