[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200430030630.GB3546299@ubuntu-s3-xlarge-x86>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 20:06:30 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Clang-Built-Linux ML <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Golovin <dima@...ovin.in>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Allow ld.lld to link the MIPS VDSO
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 09:04:42AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 12:14 AM Nathan Chancellor
> <natechancellor@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Patch 1 adds ld.lld support to Kconfig so that we can avoid certain
> > ld.bfd checks.
> >
>
> Is it possible to introduce and add LD_IS_BFD Kconfig for ld.bfd in this series?
> Most people agreed on this name AFAICS.
> What do people think?
>
> - Sedat -
What is the use case for LD_IS_BFD right now? I am not sure I see a
reason to add a CONFIG value that won't see any immediate use.
Cheers,
Nathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists