[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MN2PR21MB14373FE40A4D3AD012FAEC49CAAA0@MN2PR21MB1437.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:42:55 +0000
From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
CC: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com"
<clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] hv_netvsc: Fix netvsc_start_xmit's return type
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 2:02 AM
> To: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang
> <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>; Stephen Hemminger
> <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>; Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>; linux-
> hyperv@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com; Sami
> Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hv_netvsc: Fix netvsc_start_xmit's return type
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:06:09AM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:
> > From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com> Sent: Tuesday,
> > April 28, 2020 10:55 AM
> > >
> > > Do note that netvsc_xmit still returns int because netvsc_xmit has a
> > > potential return from netvsc_vf_xmit, which does not return
> > > netdev_tx_t because of the call to dev_queue_xmit.
> > >
> > > I am not sure if that is an oversight that was introduced by commit
> > > 0c195567a8f6e ("netvsc: transparent VF management") or if everything
> > > works properly as it is now.
> > >
> > > My patch is purely concerned with making the definition match the
> > > prototype so it should be NFC aside from avoiding the CFI panic.
> > >
> >
> > While it probably works correctly now, I'm not too keen on just
> > changing the return type for netvsc_start_xmit() and assuming the
> > 'int' that is returned from netvsc_xmit() will be correctly mapped to
> > the netdev_tx_t enum type. While that mapping probably happens
> > correctly at the moment, this really should have a more holistic fix.
>
> While it might work correctly, I am not sure that the mapping is correct,
> hence that comment.
>
> netdev_tx_t is an enum with two acceptable types, 0x00 and 0x10. Up until
> commit 0c195567a8f6e ("netvsc: transparent VF management"), netvsc_xmit
> was guaranteed to return something of type netdev_tx_t.
>
> However, after said commit, we could return anything from netvsc_vf_xmit,
> which in turn calls dev_queue_xmit then __dev_queue_xmit which will
> return either an error code (-ENOMEM or
> -ENETDOWN) or something from __dev_xmit_skb, which appears to be
> NET_XMIT_SUCCESS, NET_XMIT_DROP, or NET_XMIT_CN.
>
> It does not look like netvsc_xmit or netvsc_vf_xmit try to convert those
> returns to netdev_tx_t in some way; netvsc_vf_xmit just passes the return
> value up to netvsc_xmit, which is the part that I am unsure about...
>
> > Nathan -- are you willing to look at doing the more holistic fix? Or
> > should we see about asking Haiyang Zhang to do it?
>
> I would be fine trying to look at a more holistic fix but I know basically nothing
> about this subsystem. I am unsure if something like this would be acceptable
> or if something else needs to happen.
> Otherwise, I'd be fine with you guys taking a look and just giving me
> reported-by credit.
Here is more info regarding Linux network subsystem:
As said in "include/linux/netdevice.h", drivers are allowed to return any codes
from the three different namespaces.
And hv_netvsc needs to support "transparent VF", and calls netvsc_vf_xmit >>
dev_queue_xmit which returns qdisc return codes, and errnos like -ENOMEM,
etc. These are compliant with the guideline below:
79 /*
80 * Transmit return codes: transmit return codes originate from three different
81 * namespaces:
82 *
83 * - qdisc return codes
84 * - driver transmit return codes
85 * - errno values
86 *
87 * Drivers are allowed to return any one of those in their hard_start_xmit()
Also, ndo_start_xmit function pointer is used by upper layer functions which can
handles three types of the return codes.
For example, in the calling stack: ndo_start_xmit << netdev_start_xmit <<
xmit_one << dev_hard_start_xmit():
The function dev_hard_start_xmit() uses dev_xmit_complete() to handle the
return codes. It handles three types of the return codes correctly.
3483 struct sk_buff *dev_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *first, struct net_device *dev,
3484 struct netdev_queue *txq, int *ret)
3485 {
3486 struct sk_buff *skb = first;
3487 int rc = NETDEV_TX_OK;
3488
3489 while (skb) {
3490 struct sk_buff *next = skb->next;
3491
3492 skb_mark_not_on_list(skb);
3493 rc = xmit_one(skb, dev, txq, next != NULL);
3494 if (unlikely(!dev_xmit_complete(rc))) {
3495 skb->next = next;
3496 goto out;
3497 }
3498
3499 skb = next;
3500 if (netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq) && skb) {
3501 rc = NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
3502 break;
3503 }
3504 }
3505
3506 out:
3507 *ret = rc;
3508 return skb;
3509 }
118 /*
119 * Current order: NETDEV_TX_MASK > NET_XMIT_MASK >= 0 is significant;
120 * hard_start_xmit() return < NET_XMIT_MASK means skb was consumed.
121 */
122 static inline bool dev_xmit_complete(int rc)
123 {
124 /*
125 * Positive cases with an skb consumed by a driver:
126 * - successful transmission (rc == NETDEV_TX_OK)
127 * - error while transmitting (rc < 0)
128 * - error while queueing to a different device (rc & NET_XMIT_MASK)
129 */
130 if (likely(rc < NET_XMIT_MASK))
131 return true;
132
133 return false;
134 }
Regarding "a more holistic fix", I believe the return type of ndo_start_xmit should be
int, because of three namespaces of the return codes. This means to change all network
drivers. I'm not proposing to do this big change right now.
So I have no objection of your patch.
Thanks,
- Haiyang
Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists