[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200430161815.GE25258@willie-the-truck>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:18:15 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Al Grant <Al.Grant@....com>, James Clark <James.Clark@....com>,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: perf_event: Fix time_offset for arch timer
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 06:04:36PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 04:29:23PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
> > I wonder if we could/should make __sched_clock_offset available even when
> > CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK isn't defined. It feels like it would
> > help with this particular can or worm...
>
> Errrgh. __sched_clock_offset is only needed on x86 because we transition
> from one clock device to another on boot. It really shouldn't exist on
> anything sane.
I think we still transition from jiffies on arm64, because we don't register
with sched_clock until the timer driver probes. Marc, is that right?
> Let me try and understand your particular problem better.
I think the long and short of it is that userspace needs a way to convert
the raw counter cycles into a ns value that can be compared against values
coming out of sched_clock. To do this accurately, I think it needs the
cycles value at the point when sched_clock was initialised.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists