[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=U64XLRFkTyTi1qDZjTYQKJ9WVBf3OoULpw6yncOQURTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:47:27 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] serial: kgdboc: Allow earlycon initialization to be deferred
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 9:18 AM Daniel Thompson
<daniel.thompson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Currently there is no guarantee that an earlycon will be initialized
> before kgdboc tries to adopt it. Almost the opposite: on systems
> with ACPI then if earlycon has no arguments then it is guaranteed that
> earlycon will not be initialized.
>
> This patch mitigates the problem by giving kgdboc_earlycon a second
> chance during console_init(). This isn't quite as good as stopping during
> early parameter parsing but it is still early in the kernel boot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v2: Simplified, more robust, runs earlier, still has Doug's
> recent patchset as a prerequisite. What's not to like?
>
> More specifically, based on feedback from Doug Anderson, I
> have replaced the initial hacky implementation with a console
> initcall.
>
> I also made it defer more aggressively after realizing that both
> earlycon and kgdboc_earlycon are handled as early parameters
> (meaning I think the current approach relies on the ordering
> of drivers/tty/serial/Makefile to ensure the earlycon is enabled
> before kgdboc tries to adopt it).
>
> Finally, my apologies to Jason and kgdb ML folks, who are seeing
> this patch for the first time. I copied the original circulation
> list from a patch that wasn't kgdb related and forgot to update.
>
> drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Thanks, this looks great!
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists