[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bbe98908-4787-4981-0248-955b2cd2db19@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 10:31:53 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: Guixiong Wei <guixiongwei@...il.com>, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org
Cc: steve.capper@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rppt@...ux.ibm.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
guro@...com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
nsaenzjulienne@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: mm: use __pfn_to_section() to get mem_section
On 04/30/2020 09:34 AM, Guixiong Wei wrote:
> Use __pfn_to_section() to get mem_section, instead of open-coding it.
There is no open coding here. __pfn_to_section() helper which already
wraps around __nr_to_section(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn)), should be used
directly instead.
> No semantic changes.
and functional change. Please reword the commit message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guixiong Wei <guixiongwei@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index e42727e3568e..d2df416b840e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
> if (pfn_to_section_nr(pfn) >= NR_MEM_SECTIONS)
> return 0;
>
> - if (!valid_section(__nr_to_section(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn))))
> + if (!valid_section(__pfn_to_section(pfn))
Looks good.
> return 0;
> #endif
> return memblock_is_map_memory(addr);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists