[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR04MB462931F8DF1112CAF7F80CA4FCAA0@BYAPR04MB4629.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:11:17 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>,
"asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
"nguyenb@...eaurora.org" <nguyenb@...eaurora.org>,
"hongwus@...eaurora.org" <hongwus@...eaurora.org>,
"rnayak@...eaurora.org" <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
"stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
"alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
"bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-team@...roid.com" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
"saravanak@...gle.com" <saravanak@...gle.com>,
"salyzyn@...gle.com" <salyzyn@...gle.com>
CC: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/1] scsi: pm: Balance pm_only counter of request queue
during system resume
>
> On 2020-04-29 21:10, Can Guo wrote:
> > During system resume, scsi_resume_device() decreases a request queue's
> > pm_only counter if the scsi device was quiesced before. But after that,
> > if the scsi device's RPM status is RPM_SUSPENDED, the pm_only counter is
> > still held (non-zero). Current scsi resume hook only sets the RPM status
> > of the scsi device and its request queue to RPM_ACTIVE, but leaves the
> > pm_only counter unchanged. This may make the request queue's pm_only
> > counter remain non-zero after resume hook returns, hence those who are
> > waiting on the mq_freeze_wq would never be woken up. Fix this by calling
> > blk_post_runtime_resume() if pm_only is non-zero to balance the pm_only
> > counter which is held by the scsi device's RPM ops.
>
> How was this issue discovered? How has this patch been tested?
I think this insight was originally gained as part of commit fb276f770118
(scsi: ufs: Enable block layer runtime PM for well-known logical units)
But I will let Can reply on that.
Thanks,
Avri
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists