[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <your-ad-here.call-01588242134-ext-2784@work.hours>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 12:22:14 +0200
From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Philipp Rudo <prudo@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: ptrace: hard-code "s390x" instead of UTS_MACHINE
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:31:13AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> s390 uses the UTS_MACHINE defined arch/s390/Makefile as follows:
>
> UTS_MACHINE := s390x
>
> We do not need to pass the fixed string from the command line.
> Hard-code user_regset_view::name, like many other architectures do.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> ---
>
> arch/s390/kernel/Makefile | 5 -----
> arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
Yes, since we don't have 31-bit kernel build support for s390 anymore
this makes sense.
Applied, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists