[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a3d68fd-c489-c0d5-8612-69f15be1bf64@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 12:44:00 +0100
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Haiyan Song <haiyanx.song@...el.com>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Paul Clarke <pc@...ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kajoljain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
"linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/12] perf test: improve pmu event metric testing
On 30/04/2020 08:51, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Add a basic floating point number test to expr.
> Break pmu-events test into 2 and add a test to verify that all pmu metric
> expressions simply parse.
Could we add also add something in jevents to ensure this?
Thanks,
John
Try to parse all metric ids/events, failing if
> metrics for the current architecture fail to parse.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists