[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fa72cc36-0204-fb82-6c62-ae43cb13260f@web.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:56:23 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/mcde: dsi: Fix return value check in
mcde_dsi_bind()
> The of_drm_find_bridge() function returns NULL on error, it doesn't return
> error pointers so this check doesn't work.
How do you think about a wording variant like the following?
Change description:
An error pointer check was performed after a call of the
function “of_drm_find_bridge” despite of the detail
that failures are indicated for the bridge search
by null pointers instead.
Thus adjust a check for the failure predicate
and the corresponding exception handling.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists