linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/13] MIPS: ingenic: DTS: Respect cell count of common properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <SSOL9Q.SPOBZNC76Y5J2@crapouillou.net>
Date:   Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:17:16 +0200
From:   Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, od@...c.me,
        周琰杰 <zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] MIPS: ingenic: DTS: Respect cell count of common
 properties

Hi Thomas,

Le mer. 29 avril 2020 à 23:04, Thomas Bogendoerfer 
<tsbogend@...ha.franken.de> a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 05:26:27PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>>  If N fields of X cells should be provided, then that's what the
>>  devicetree should represent, instead of having one single field of
>>  (N*X) cells.
>> 
>>  Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
>>  ---
>>   arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4740.dtsi | 19 +++++++++----------
>>   arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4770.dtsi | 12 +++++-------
>>   arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4780.dtsi | 24 
>> +++++++++++-------------
>>   arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/x1000.dtsi  |  9 ++++-----
>>   4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> applied to mips-next. Please check if my resolution of the conflict
> in arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4780.dtsi is correct.

Looks good, thanks.

-Paul

> Thomas.
> 
> --
> Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not 
> necessarily a
> good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 
> 2.3 ]