lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 1 May 2020 18:26:10 +0000
From:   <Ajay.Kathat@...rochip.com>
To:     <oscar.carter@....com>, <adham.abozaeid@...rochip.com>
CC:     <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <rachel.kim@...el.com>,
        <johnny.kim@...el.com>, <chris.park@...el.com>,
        <dean.lee@...el.com>, <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: Increase the size of wid_list array


On 01/05/20 10:32 pm, Oscar Carter wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> Increase by one the size of wid_list array as index variable can reach a
> value of 5. If this happens, an out-of-bounds access is performed.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1451981 ("Out-of-bounds access")
> Fixes: c5c77ba18ea66 ("staging: wilc1000: Add SDIO/SPI 802.11 driver")

The code changes are fine. But the correct commit for Fixes tag should be

Fixes: f5a3cb90b802d ("staging: wilc1000: add passive scan support")


Regards,
Ajay

> Signed-off-by: Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/wilc1000/hif.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/hif.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/hif.c
> index 6c7de2f8d3f2..128943c3be4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/hif.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/hif.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ int wilc_scan(struct wilc_vif *vif, u8 scan_source, u8 scan_type,
>               void *user_arg, struct cfg80211_scan_request *request)
>  {
>         int result = 0;
> -       struct wid wid_list[5];
> +       struct wid wid_list[6];
>         u32 index = 0;
>         u32 i, scan_timeout;
>         u8 *buffer;
> --
> 2.20.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists