linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 21/29] mm: remove the pgprot argument to _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200501150947.367ca6b38a394f1ff678ed4b@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 1 May 2020 15:09:47 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     John Dorminy <jdorminy@...hat.com>
Cc:     Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Gao Xiang <xiang@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/29] mm: remove the pgprot argument to __vmalloc

On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 22:38:10 -0400 John Dorminy <jdorminy@...hat.com> wrote:

> the change
> description refers to PROT_KERNEL, which is a symbol which does not
> appear to exist; perhaps PAGE_KERNEL was meant?

Yes, thanks, fixed.