lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:59:50 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 30/38] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where
 CPU0 is busy for a long time

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 09:22:33AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 08:22:28AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit a900aeac253729411cf33c6cb598c152e9e4137f ]
>>
>> Boot CPU0 always handle I2C interrupt and under some rare circumstances
>> (like running KASAN + NFS root) it may stuck in uninterruptible state for
>> a significant time. In this case we will get timeout if I2C transfer is
>> running on a sibling CPU, despite of IRQ being raised. In order to handle
>> this rare condition, the IRQ status needs to be checked after completion
>> timeout.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
>>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
>Hi Sasha,
>
>can you drop this from the v5.6 stable queue please? Jon discovered that
>this patch introduces a regression in v5.7, and since we don't have a
>good understanding of why this is breaking things I think it'd be best
>if we reverted it for v5.7 until we come up with a good fix.
>
>I think the same applies for the other i2c/tegra patch that's 31/38 of
>this series.

I've dropped both of these, thanks!

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha

Powered by blists - more mailing lists