[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200501091933.GA3084@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 02:19:33 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, ira.weiny@...el.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT (xtensa)"
<linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org>
Subject: Re: xtensa question, was Re: [PATCH V1 00/10] Remove duplicated kmap
code
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 02:02:19AM -0700, Max Filippov wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 1:46 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> > any idea why xtensa uses PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC instead of PAGE_KERNEL
> > for kmap_prot? Mapping all mapped highmem as executable seems rather
> > dangerous.
>
> I sure do: to allow instruction cache flushing when writing to high user
> pages temporarily mapped with kmap. Instruction cache management
> opcodes that operate on virtual addresses would raise an exception if
> the address is not executable.
Seems like this should use kmap_atomic_prot with PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC just
for that case. Which of course didn't exist on xtensa so far, but with
this series will.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists