lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 01 May 2020 12:27:23 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     lgirdwood@...il.com, pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com,
        daniel.baluta@....com, kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com,
        Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
        ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     "moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..." 
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Jaska Uimonen <jaska.uimonen@...ux.intel.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:SOUND - SOUND OPEN FIRMWARE SOF DRIVERS" 
        <sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: Update correct LED status at the first time usage of update_mute_led()

On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:11:39 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> At the first time update_mute_led() gets called, if channels are already
> muted, the temp value equals to led_value as 0, skipping the following
> LED setting.
> 
> So set led_value to -1 as an uninitialized state, to update the correct
> LED status at first time usage.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-5.7

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: SOF: Update correct LED status at the first time usage of update_mute_led()
      commit: 49c22696348d6e7c8a2ecfd7e60fddfe188ded82

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ