lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri,  1 May 2020 15:20:41 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 005/117] drm/msm: Use the correct dma_sync calls harder

From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>

commit 9f614197c744002f9968e82c649fdf7fe778e1e7 upstream.

Looks like the dma_sync calls don't do what we want on armv7 either.
Fixes:

  Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 50001000
  pgd = (ptrval)
  [50001000] *pgd=00000000
  Internal error: Oops: 805 [#1] SMP ARM
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-00271-g9f159ae07f07 #4
  Hardware name: Freescale i.MX53 (Device Tree Support)
  PC is at v7_dma_clean_range+0x20/0x38
  LR is at __dma_page_cpu_to_dev+0x28/0x90
  pc : [<c011c76c>]    lr : [<c01181c4>]    psr: 20000013
  sp : d80b5a88  ip : de96c000  fp : d840ce6c
  r10: 00000000  r9 : 00000001  r8 : d843e010
  r7 : 00000000  r6 : 00008000  r5 : ddb6c000  r4 : 00000000
  r3 : 0000003f  r2 : 00000040  r1 : 50008000  r0 : 50001000
  Flags: nzCv  IRQs on  FIQs on  Mode SVC_32  ISA ARM  Segment none
  Control: 10c5387d  Table: 70004019  DAC: 00000051
  Process swapper/0 (pid: 1, stack limit = 0x(ptrval))

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
Fixes: 3de433c5b38a ("drm/msm: Use the correct dma_sync calls in msm_gem")
Tested-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static void sync_for_device(struct msm_g
 {
 	struct device *dev = msm_obj->base.dev->dev;
 
-	if (get_dma_ops(dev)) {
+	if (get_dma_ops(dev) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64)) {
 		dma_sync_sg_for_device(dev, msm_obj->sgt->sgl,
 			msm_obj->sgt->nents, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
 	} else {
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void sync_for_cpu(struct msm_gem_
 {
 	struct device *dev = msm_obj->base.dev->dev;
 
-	if (get_dma_ops(dev)) {
+	if (get_dma_ops(dev) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64)) {
 		dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(dev, msm_obj->sgt->sgl,
 			msm_obj->sgt->nents, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
 	} else {


Powered by blists - more mailing lists