[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200501131506.189325050@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 15:22:46 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Xiumei Mu <xmu@...hat.com>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 21/46] cpumap: Avoid warning when CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS is enabled
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
commit bc23d0e3f717ced21fbfacab3ab887d55e5ba367 upstream.
When the kernel is built with CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS, the cpumap code
can trigger a spurious warning if CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is also set. This
happens because in this configuration, NR_CPUS can be larger than
nr_cpumask_bits, so the initial check in cpu_map_alloc() is not sufficient
to guard against hitting the warning in cpumask_check().
Fix this by explicitly checking the supplied key against the
nr_cpumask_bits variable before calling cpu_possible().
Fixes: 6710e1126934 ("bpf: introduce new bpf cpu map type BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP")
Reported-by: Xiumei Mu <xmu@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Xiumei Mu <xmu@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200416083120.453718-1-toke@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/bpf/cpumap.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int cpu_map_update_elem(struct bp
return -EOVERFLOW;
/* Make sure CPU is a valid possible cpu */
- if (!cpu_possible(key_cpu))
+ if (key_cpu >= nr_cpumask_bits || !cpu_possible(key_cpu))
return -ENODEV;
if (qsize == 0) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists