[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200501131537.864103346@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 15:23:28 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 49/83] bpf, x86_32: Fix logic error in BPF_LDX zero-extension
From: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
commit 5ca1ca01fae1e90f8d010eb1d83374f28dc11ee6 upstream.
When verifier_zext is true, we don't need to emit code
for zero-extension.
Fixes: 836256bf5f37 ("x32: bpf: eliminate zero extension code-gen")
Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200423050637.GA4029@udknight
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -1847,7 +1847,7 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_p
case BPF_B:
case BPF_H:
case BPF_W:
- if (!bpf_prog->aux->verifier_zext)
+ if (bpf_prog->aux->verifier_zext)
break;
if (dstk) {
EMIT3(0xC7, add_1reg(0x40, IA32_EBP),
Powered by blists - more mailing lists