lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri,  1 May 2020 15:23:23 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Alexander Schmidt <alexs@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.6 050/106] s390/pci: do not set affinity for floating irqs

From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>

commit 86dbf32da150339ca81509fa2eb84c814b55258b upstream.

with the introduction of CPU directed interrupts the kernel
parameter pci=force_floating was introduced to fall back
to the previous behavior using floating irqs.

However we were still setting the affinity in that case,
both in __irq_alloc_descs() and via the irq_set_affinity
callback in struct irq_chip.

For the former only set the affinity in the directed case.

The latter is explicitly set in zpci_directed_irq_init()
so we can just leave it unset for the floating case.

Fixes: e979ce7bced2 ("s390/pci: provide support for CPU directed interrupts")
Co-developed-by: Alexander Schmidt <alexs@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Schmidt <alexs@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c
+++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c
@@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ static struct irq_chip zpci_irq_chip = {
 	.name = "PCI-MSI",
 	.irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq,
 	.irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq,
-	.irq_set_affinity = zpci_set_irq_affinity,
 };
 
 static void zpci_handle_cpu_local_irq(bool rescan)
@@ -276,7 +275,9 @@ int arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *
 		rc = -EIO;
 		if (hwirq - bit >= msi_vecs)
 			break;
-		irq = __irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, 1, 0, THIS_MODULE, msi->affinity);
+		irq = __irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, 1, 0, THIS_MODULE,
+				(irq_delivery == DIRECTED) ?
+				msi->affinity : NULL);
 		if (irq < 0)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 		rc = irq_set_msi_desc(irq, msi);


Powered by blists - more mailing lists