linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] timeout fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 1 May 2020 16:55:16 +0300
From:   Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] timeout fixes

On 01/05/2020 07:26, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/1/20 3:38 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 01/05/2020 11:21, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>> On 30/04/2020 22:31, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>> [1,2] are small random patches.
>>>> [3,4] are the last 2 timeout patches, but with 1 var renamed.
>>>> [5] fixes a timeout problem related to batched CQ commits. From
>>>> what I see, this should be the last fixing timeouts.
>>>
>>> Something gone wrong with testing or rebasing. Never mind this.
>>
>> io_uring-5.7 hangs the first test in link_timeout.c. I'll debug it today,
>> but by any chance, does anyone happen to know something?
> 

Yeah, just found the culprit myself

> That's not your stuff, see:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/269ef3a5-e30f-ceeb-5f5e-58563e7c5367@kernel.dk/T/#ma61d47f59eaaa7f04ae686c117fab69c957e0d7d
> 
> which then just turned into a modification to a patch in io_uring-5.7
> instead. Just force rebase that branch and it should work fine.

Got it, thanks

-- 
Pavel Begunkov