[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e4d5ddc0-877f-6499-f697-2b7c0ddbf386@cloud.ionos.com>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 10:56:51 +0200
From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ud.ionos.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hch@...radead.org, david@...morbit.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cl@...ux.com, mike.kravetz@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 0/9] Introduce attach/clear_page_private to cleanup
code
On 5/2/20 2:41 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 12:42:15AM +0200, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
>> On 5/2/20 12:16 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:44:41PM +0200, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
>>>> include/linux/pagemap.h: introduce attach/clear_page_private
>>>> md: remove __clear_page_buffers and use attach/clear_page_private
>>>> btrfs: use attach/clear_page_private
>>>> fs/buffer.c: use attach/clear_page_private
>>>> f2fs: use attach/clear_page_private
>>>> iomap: use attach/clear_page_private
>>>> ntfs: replace attach_page_buffers with attach_page_private
>>>> orangefs: use attach/clear_page_private
>>>> buffer_head.h: remove attach_page_buffers
>>> I think mm/migrate.c could also use this:
>>>
>>> ClearPagePrivate(page);
>>> set_page_private(newpage, page_private(page));
>>> set_page_private(page, 0);
>>> put_page(page);
>>> get_page(newpage);
>>>
>> Thanks for checking! Assume the below change is appropriate.
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>> index 7160c1556f79..f214adfb3fa4 100644
>> --- a/mm/migrate.c
>> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
>> @@ -797,10 +797,7 @@ static int __buffer_migrate_page(struct address_space
>> *mapping,
>> if (rc != MIGRATEPAGE_SUCCESS)
>> goto unlock_buffers;
>>
>> - ClearPagePrivate(page);
>> - set_page_private(newpage, page_private(page));
>> - set_page_private(page, 0);
>> - put_page(page);
>> + set_page_private(newpage, detach_page_private(page));
>> get_page(newpage);
> I think you can do:
>
> @@ -797,11 +797,7 @@ static int __buffer_migrate_page(struct address_space *mapping,
> if (rc != MIGRATEPAGE_SUCCESS)
> goto unlock_buffers;
>
> - ClearPagePrivate(page);
> - set_page_private(newpage, page_private(page));
> - set_page_private(page, 0);
> - put_page(page);
> - get_page(newpage);
> + attach_page_private(newpage, detach_page_private(page));
>
> bh = head;
> do {
> @@ -810,8 +806,6 @@ static int __buffer_migrate_page(struct address_space *mapping,
>
> } while (bh != head);
>
> - SetPagePrivate(newpage);
> -
> if (mode != MIGRATE_SYNC_NO_COPY)
>
> ... but maybe there's a subtlety to the ordering of the setup of the bh
> and setting PagePrivate that means what you have there is a better patch.
Yes, it is better but not sure if the order can be changed here. And seems
the original commit is this one.
commit e965f9630c651fa4249039fd4b80c9392d07a856
Author: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Date: Wed Feb 1 03:05:41 2006 -0800
[PATCH] Direct Migration V9: Avoid writeback / page_migrate() method
Migrate a page with buffers without requiring writeback
This introduces a new address space operation migratepage() that
may be used
by a filesystem to implement its own version of page migration.
A version is provided that migrates buffers attached to pages. Some
filesystems (ext2, ext3, xfs) are modified to utilize this feature.
The swapper address space operation are modified so that a regular
migrate_page() will occur for anonymous pages without writeback
(migrate_pages
forces every anonymous page to have a swap entry).
Hope mm experts could take a look, so CC more people and mm list. And
the question is that if we can setting PagePrivate before setup bh in the
__buffer_migrate_page, thanks for your any further input.
Thanks,
Guoqing
Powered by blists - more mailing lists