[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200502200806.1d6b1cba@xps13>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 20:08:06 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Kamal Dasu <kamal.dasu@...adcom.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: set mtd partition panic write flag
Hi Kamal,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote on Thu, 9 Jan 2020
18:28:07 +0100:
> Hi Kamal,
>
> Kamal Dasu <kamal.dasu@...adcom.com> wrote on Thu, 9 Jan 2020 10:25:59
> -0500:
>
> > Miquel,
> >
> > Yes the issue is still open. I was trying to understand the suggestion
> > and did not get a reply on the question I had
> >
> > Richard wrote :
> > "So the right fix would be setting the parent's oops_panic_write in
> > mtd_panic_write().
> > Then we don't have to touch mtdpart.c"
> >
> > How do I get access to the parts parent in the core ?. Maybe I am
> > missing something.
>
> I think the solution is to set the oops_panic_write of the root parent, instead of updating the flag of the mtd device itself (which is maybe a partition).
>
> Would this help?
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mtd/msg10454.html
I'm pinging you here as well, as I think you raise a real issue, and we
agreed on a solution, which can now be easily setup with the above
change which has been applied and support for functions like:
static inline struct mtd_info *mtd_get_master(struct mtd_info *mtd)
static inline u64 mtd_get_master_ofs(struct mtd_info *mtd, u64 ofs)
static inline bool mtd_is_partition(const struct mtd_info *mtd)
static inline bool mtd_has_partitions(const struct mtd_info *mtd)
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists