lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200503114557.GA10332@udknight>
Date:   Sun, 3 May 2020 19:45:57 +0800
From:   Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] checkpatch: add support to check 'Fixes:' tag format

On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 09:40:24PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> 
> 
> > +				$diagnostics .= "Missing a pair of parentheses '()' or a pair of double quotation marks (\"\").\n";
> 
> Can such a message trigger any more thoughts and development ideas?

No, I don't think so. '(" ... ")' is the minimum interface between analyser
(checkpatch) and commit id description (normal commit id and 'Fixes:' tag)
about the title, it is very difficult if not impossible to guess the title
boundary and whether it is the *REAL* title that folllow the SHA1 without
this precondition, and it is more difficult to do it when we need to support
title which across lines in the normal commit id description.

At last I really doubt the benefit it brings deserves the complexity and the
current diagnostics info is enough clear for most situation.

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ