linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.6 02/73] dma-buf: Fix SET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200504165502.155875888@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  4 May 2020 19:57:05 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>,
        Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
        minchan@...nel.org, surenb@...gle.com, jenhaochen@...gle.com,
        Martin Liu <liumartin@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.6 02/73] dma-buf: Fix SET_NAME ioctl uapi

From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>

commit a5bff92eaac45bdf6221badf9505c26792fdf99e upstream.

The uapi is the same on 32 and 64 bit, but the number isn't. Everyone
who botched this please re-read:

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.4-preprc-cpu/ioctl/botching-up-ioctls.html

Also, the type argument for the ioctl macros is for the type the void
__user *arg pointer points at, which in this case would be the
variable-sized char[] of a 0 terminated string. So this was botched in
more than just the usual ways.

Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
Cc: Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Cc: minchan@...nel.org
Cc: surenb@...gle.com
Cc: jenhaochen@...gle.com
Cc: Martin Liu <liumartin@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
Tested-by: Martin Liu <liumartin@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Liu <liumartin@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
  [sumits: updated some checkpatch fixes, corrected author email]
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200407133002.3486387-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c    |    3 ++-
 include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h |    6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -388,7 +388,8 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *f
 
 		return ret;
 
-	case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME:
+	case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A:
+	case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B:
 		return dma_buf_set_name(dmabuf, (const char __user *)arg);
 
 	default:
--- a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
@@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
 
 #define DMA_BUF_BASE		'b'
 #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct dma_buf_sync)
+
+/* 32/64bitness of this uapi was botched in android, there's no difference
+ * between them in actual uapi, they're just different numbers.
+ */
 #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, const char *)
+#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u32)
+#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u64)
 
 #endif