linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH] ima: verify mprotect change is consistent with mmap policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1588627060-7399-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon,  4 May 2020 17:17:40 -0400
From:   Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ima: verify mprotect change is consistent with mmap policy

Files can be mmap'ed read/write and later changed to execute to circumvent
IMA's mmap appraise policy rules.  Due to locking issues (mmap semaphore
would be taken prior to i_mutex), files can not be measured or appraised at
this point.  Eliminate this integrity gap, by denying the mprotect
PROT_EXECUTE change, if an mmap appraise policy rule exists.

On mprotect change success, return 0.  On failure, return -EACESS.

Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/ima.h               |  7 ++++++
 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 security/security.c               |  7 +++++-
 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/ima.h b/include/linux/ima.h
index aefe758f4466..9164e1534ec9 100644
--- a/include/linux/ima.h
+++ b/include/linux/ima.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ extern int ima_file_check(struct file *file, int mask);
 extern void ima_post_create_tmpfile(struct inode *inode);
 extern void ima_file_free(struct file *file);
 extern int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long prot);
+extern int ima_file_mprotect(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long prot);
 extern int ima_load_data(enum kernel_load_data_id id);
 extern int ima_read_file(struct file *file, enum kernel_read_file_id id);
 extern int ima_post_read_file(struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size,
@@ -70,6 +71,12 @@ static inline int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long prot)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static inline int ima_file_mprotect(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+				    unsigned long prot)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static inline int ima_load_data(enum kernel_load_data_id id)
 {
 	return 0;
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index f96f151294e6..a8706bf7ca25 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -394,6 +394,56 @@ int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long prot)
 }
 
 /**
+ * ima_file_mprotect - based on policy, limit mprotect change
+ * @prot: contains the protection that will be applied by the kernel.
+ *
+ * Files can be mmap'ed read/write and later changed to execute to circumvent
+ * IMA's mmap appraisal policy rules.  Due to locking issues (mmap semaphore
+ * would be taken before i_mutex), files can not be measured or appraised at
+ * this point.  Eliminate this integrity gap by denying the mprotect
+ * PROT_EXECUTE change, if an mmap appraise policy rule exists.
+ *
+ * On mprotect change success, return 0.  On failure, return -EACESS.
+ */
+int ima_file_mprotect(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long prot)
+{
+	struct ima_template_desc *template;
+	struct inode *inode;
+	int result = 0;
+	int action;
+	u32 secid;
+	int pcr;
+
+	if (vma->vm_file && (prot & PROT_EXEC) && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC)) {
+		inode = file_inode(vma->vm_file);
+
+		security_task_getsecid(current, &secid);
+		action = ima_get_action(inode, current_cred(), secid, MAY_EXEC,
+					MMAP_CHECK, &pcr, &template, 0);
+
+		if (action & IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)
+			result = -EPERM;
+
+		if ((action & IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK) || (action & IMA_MEASURE)) {
+			struct file *file = vma->vm_file;
+			char *pathbuf = NULL;
+			const char *pathname;
+			char filename[NAME_MAX];
+
+			pathname = ima_d_path(&file->f_path, &pathbuf,
+					      filename);
+			integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_DATA, inode,
+					    pathname, "collect_data",
+					    "failed-mprotect", result, 0);
+
+			if (pathbuf)
+				__putname(pathbuf);
+		}
+	}
+	return result;
+}
+
+/**
  * ima_bprm_check - based on policy, collect/store measurement.
  * @bprm: contains the linux_binprm structure
  *
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 7fed24b9d57e..dd0917c5bfe9 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -1512,7 +1512,12 @@ int security_mmap_addr(unsigned long addr)
 int security_file_mprotect(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long reqprot,
 			    unsigned long prot)
 {
-	return call_int_hook(file_mprotect, 0, vma, reqprot, prot);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = call_int_hook(file_mprotect, 0, vma, reqprot, prot);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	return ima_file_mprotect(vma, prot);
 }
 
 int security_file_lock(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd)
-- 
2.7.5