lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5ho8r4f6hx.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date:   Mon, 04 May 2020 10:29:14 +0200
From:   Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:     Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
Cc:     <perex@...ex.cz>, <tiwai@...e.com>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        <jonathanh@...dia.com>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <sharadg@...dia.com>, <mkumard@...dia.com>,
        <viswanathl@...dia.com>, <rlokhande@...dia.com>,
        <dramesh@...dia.com>, <atalambedu@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Tegra194 HW Fixes

On Mon, 04 May 2020 10:16:13 +0200,
Sameer Pujar wrote:
> 
> This series proposes SW workarounds for Tegra194 HDA HW bugs.
> Following are the two issues seen:
>  1. GCAP register does not reflect true capability.
>     The actual number of SDO lines is "4", where as it reflects "2".
>  2. With 4 SDO line configuration playback fails for,
>     44.1K/48K, 2-channel, 16-bps audio stream.
> 
> After fixing [1], issue [2] is uncovered.
> As per recommendation by Tegra HW team the workarounds are pushed.
> 
> Testing done
> ============
>  * Verify GCAP register after registering HDA sound card
>  * Verify audio playback for 44.1K/48K, 2-channel, 16-bps.
> 
> Sameer Pujar (3):
>   ALSA: hda/tegra: correct number of SDO lines for Tegra194
>   ALSA: hda: add member to store ratio for stripe control
>   ALSA: hda/tegra: workaround playback failure on Tegra194

Through a quick glance, all changes look good.

Is the device already in market, i.e. it had hit users?  If yes, I'm
going to merge for 5.7, otherwise for 5.8.


thanks,

Takashi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ