linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v5 1/8] scsi: ufs: enable WriteBooster on some pre-3.1 UFS devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BYAPR04MB4629F2C00ABAB512DB833232FCA60@BYAPR04MB4629.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 May 2020 10:37:52 +0000
From:   Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To:     Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
CC:     "beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        "cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
        "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kuohong.wang@...iatek.com" <kuohong.wang@...iatek.com>,
        "peter.wang@...iatek.com" <peter.wang@...iatek.com>,
        "chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com" <chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com>,
        "andy.teng@...iatek.com" <andy.teng@...iatek.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 1/8] scsi: ufs: enable WriteBooster on some pre-3.1 UFS
 devices

> 
>  static void ufshcd_wb_probe(struct ufs_hba *hba, u8 *desc_buf)
>  {
> +       if (!ufshcd_is_wb_allowed(hba))
> +               return;
> +
> +       if (hba->desc_size.dev_desc <=
> DEVICE_DESC_PARAM_EXT_UFS_FEATURE_SUP)
Should be 
DEVICE_DESC_PARAM_EXT_UFS_FEATURE_SUP + 4 

> +               goto wb_disabled;
> +
>         hba->dev_info.d_ext_ufs_feature_sup =
>                 get_unaligned_be32(desc_buf +
>                                    DEVICE_DESC_PARAM_EXT_UFS_FEATURE_SUP);


> 
>  static int ufs_get_device_desc(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> @@ -6862,10 +6890,6 @@ static int ufs_get_device_desc(struct ufs_hba
> *hba)
> 
>         model_index = desc_buf[DEVICE_DESC_PARAM_PRDCT_NAME];
> 
> -       /* Enable WB only for UFS-3.1 */
> -       if (dev_info->wspecversion >= 0x310)
> -               ufshcd_wb_probe(hba, desc_buf);
> -
>         err = ufshcd_read_string_desc(hba, model_index,
>                                       &dev_info->model, SD_ASCII_STD);
>         if (err < 0) {
> @@ -6874,6 +6898,16 @@ static int ufs_get_device_desc(struct ufs_hba
> *hba)
>                 goto out;
>         }
> 
> +       ufs_fixup_device_setup(hba);
I don't think you should "hide" ufs_fixup_device_setup inside ufs_get_device_desc.

Thanks,
Avri