[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200504121401.GV26002@ziepe.ca>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 09:14:01 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: "Dey, Megha" <megha.dey@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, vkoul@...nel.org,
maz@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com, rafael@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, jacob.jun.pan@...el.com,
ashok.raj@...el.com, yi.l.liu@...el.com, baolu.lu@...el.com,
kevin.tian@...el.com, sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, jing.lin@...el.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
kwankhede@...dia.com, eric.auger@...hat.com, parav@...lanox.com,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 04/15] drivers/base: Add support for a new IMS irq
domain
On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 05:25:28PM -0700, Dey, Megha wrote:
> > > The use case if when we have a device assigned to a guest and we
> > > want to allocate IMS(platform-msi) interrupts for that
> > > guest-assigned device. Currently, this is abstracted through a mdev
> > > interface.
> >
> > And the mdev has the pci_device internally, so it should simply pass
> > that pci_device to the platform_msi machinery.
>
> hmm i am not sure I follow this. mdev has a pci_device internally? which
> struct are you referring to here?
mdev in general may not, but any ADI trying to use mdev will
necessarily have access to a struct pci_device.
> mdev is merely a micropartitioned PCI device right, which no real PCI
> resource backing. I am not how else we can find the IRQ domain associated
> with an mdev..
ADI always has real PCI resource backing.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists