[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1588595377-4503-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 17:59:37 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64/cpuinfo: Move device_initcall() near cpuinfo_regs_init()
This moves device_initcall() near cpuinfo_regs_init() making the calling
sequence clear. Besides it is a standard practice to have device_initcall()
(any __initcall for that matter) just after the function it actually calls.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
---
Based on 5.7-rc4
arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
index 86136075ae41..a515d8f3639e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
@@ -311,6 +311,8 @@ static int __init cpuinfo_regs_init(void)
}
return 0;
}
+device_initcall(cpuinfo_regs_init);
+
static void cpuinfo_detect_icache_policy(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
{
unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
@@ -403,5 +405,3 @@ void __init cpuinfo_store_boot_cpu(void)
boot_cpu_data = *info;
init_cpu_features(&boot_cpu_data);
}
-
-device_initcall(cpuinfo_regs_init);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists