[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b257279c-4138-b28e-584d-92bd15571ae1@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 15:05:30 +0200
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] DRM: fix struct sg_table nents vs. orig_nents
misuse
Hi Christoph,
On 04.05.2020 14:52, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 02:50:17PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> v2:
>> - dropped most of the changes to drm/i915
>> - added fixes for rcar-du, xen, media and ion
>> - fixed a few issues pointed by kbuild test robot
>> - added wide cc: list for each patch
> Didn't you plan to add dma_map_sgbuf and co helper?
Yes, I have a followup patches for that, but I wanted to fix the
existing code in the first step. Then I wanted to send a wrappers and
their application. Do you think I should do everything at once, in one
patchset?
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Powered by blists - more mailing lists